Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. Although  how to protect yourself from 5g radiation 're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters.  how to protect your body from 5g  is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances.  how to protect yourself from 5g  is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).


This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.